Difficult. But God.
So says the opinion section today.
Anyway, the unrelated point of this pointless post concerns the NHL's new CBA. As we all know, the near-unanimous consensus is that the owners totally annihilated the players in the negotiations, and unlike most things that are believed near-unanimously, this is true. But earlier today, the players ratified the agreement with nearly 90 per cent voting in favour. Tomorrow, the owners meet in New York to vote on the deal.
Wouldn't it be hilarious if they voted against it?
posted by M. Jake @ 10:36 PM
5 comments
links to this post
5 Comments:
There was also a misused hyphen on our front page; adverbial adjectives don't require hyphens, as its implied they're modifying the noun.
Anyway, we need to fire our proofreaders.
And I just forgot the apostorphe on "it's"--see what I mean?
Yes we do. Especially since I don't know what an "apostorphe" is. But anyway, while I could go through the paper and find numerous errors in every section, I doubt any of them would be as funny as the opinion staff ad.
Also: I hate how no one else ever makes their decisions based on what would be the funniest.
Also the second: my teams sure got hoserized in the draft lattery.
Also the third: what the fuck is a "lattery"?
Fuck.
This is in ...
All of our editors are retards who can't spell.
Myself included.
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home